![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:38 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Here’s a simple one, whats the greatest difference in HP between 2 cars you have owned.
I ll go first- 455 (2017 Camaro) - 37 (2000's !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ) = 418
So basically this:
VS this:
UPDATE:
Top of the pile so far. Interestingly both vehicles of each have the same manufacturer.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:41 |
|
Maybe 200.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:43 |
|
I haven’t owned very many powerful cars. In fact I don’t think I’ve ever topped out above 221 hp. My car history shows I like a fat low-mid range curve. My lowest was probably 120 hp
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:44 |
|
Minimum was 115 from my Mini. Max was 165 from my old Outback.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:44 |
|
425
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:45 |
|
Damn, and the cars?
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:46 |
|
200 would be the difference between the 540 and the jetta.
Hell, even if I cheat, there’s only like a 300hp difference between the 540 and my weakest scooter.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:47 |
|
I need to own more cars. I’ve only owned 2, with a 110 hp difference.
190 hp - 1988 Celica All-trac
300 hp - 2006 350Z
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:49 |
|
That’s a good range for “slow car fast” though. 120 hp is enough to get moving and feel fast (much less horsepower and the car better be reaaaaalll light) while 221 is “about as much as i can comfortably use on the street” levels of horsepower.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:49 |
|
Camaro in India? *interest piqued*
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:51 |
|
Ha ha no, The 800 is from years back- My first car. The camaro is my current car.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:52 |
|
Mazda3: 160 hp - Fiero: 92 hp = 68 hp
Not a huge difference, but definitely noticeable.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:52 |
|
Nevermind, I looked up the wrong number.
468
Current GTO (560) and a POS Plymouth Colt (92, and don’t ask).
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:54 |
|
Not that big of a jump for me.
Cavalier VLX: 110hp
Valka: 240hp
So just 130hp.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:54 |
|
207.
58 HP in an 85 Honda CRX. 265 HP in a 94 Caprice 9C1.
That Caprice is by far the outlier though. Nothing else I’ve owned has been north of 167 hp. I desperately need a LS1 in my life.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:55 |
|
The 120 was in a gen 1 rav4, and while it was slow as a dog, it didn’t weigh much (2800 lbs) and it the 5 speed made the most of it. The Torsen rear lsd made it pretty fun in the corners too. The 221 was in the 5 speed forester XT and that...was a quick car.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:56 |
|
86 HP (optimistically):
190 HP:
A difference of 104 HP.
FUN FACT: I have never owned a car with more than 200 HP.
(* Cars pictured are not mine, but look like mine)
![]() 01/10/2017 at 13:56 |
|
I cant go back from the small block chevy V8. Every other car feels under torqued by comparison.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:02 |
|
150 even
Most powerful, 05 Accord coupe V6, 242 HP.
Least powerful, 91 Civic wagon, 92 HP.
Fairly tame list.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:02 |
|
I’ve never owned anything that I consider high-powered. Guess it would be my 1997 Mustang GT (215hp) and my 1993 Mustang LX (105hp) = 110hp difference.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:04 |
|
From 205 in my first car:
To 414 in my second car:
So a total of 209.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:05 |
|
I had an older (88) Town Car in there as well. The 270 ft/lbs of the 5.0 Windsor made for some great tire smoking fun.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:07 |
|
Do I win least difference? 60hp between 4 cars.
190hp (XJ & ZJ) - 215hp Crossfire - 250hp SC400
Apparently “enough” is how much power I like to have.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:08 |
|
52hp (Rabbit (Mk. 1 Golf) diesel) to 350hp (1959 Lincoln, gross): 298hp. Real world hp jump, something more like 250.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:09 |
|
2007 F250 tuned/deleted (420/775) - 98 Ford Ranger 3.0 (150hp/185ft lb). The big jump was I got all the torques.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:09 |
|
275HP
425 in ‘06 Magnum SRT8 vs 150 in a ‘02 Stratus 2.4L.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:09 |
|
212
‘13 MB E550 (402) minus ‘99 V6 Mustang (190)
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:09 |
|
192. Most was 282 from a 1993 BMW 740i, least was 90 from a 1969 Volvo 144S. I highly doubt it made anywhere near 90, though.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:13 |
|
easy first car a 1985 sentra wagon with all of 71hp (back in 1995)
and now
2014 pathfinder with 260 hp
note I owned a hyundai, 2 Hondas, a chevy, a mazda, 2 jeeps and a suzuki between the 2 nissans
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:19 |
|
Hmmm. Not a huge variation.
60 HP 1st gen crx vs. 260hp Acura CL Type-S
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:25 |
|
How about this twist - 464hp difference between two of my vehicles from the same manufacturer!
2013 Cadillac V-wagon (556hp) - 1985 S10 pickup w/ the Iron Duke (92hp) = 464hp!
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:27 |
|
14 RS 3 Mustang: 575 hp
76 Mustang II: 92 hp
Difference of 483.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:33 |
|
I’ll play: 182hp
The lowest HP would be the 1988 Acura Integras at 118, with the highest being 300 in the 93 Corvette. Funny enough, I still own an example of each car. The 93 LT1/6 speed vette is my current daily driver, and one of the 88 integras is my SCCA ITA class racecar.
The difference in torque is even bigger: 426 ft/lbs. The 88 integras would still be the least amount of tourqe at 99 ft/lbs. My old 2002 F250 7.3 power stroke would top the list at 525 ft/lbs. If limited to cars only, the 93 vette would be at the top with 340 ft/lbs for a difference of 239 ft/lbs.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:40 |
|
I started with 110 hp (ha!) in my ‘84 Gutless Ciera, and my max horsepower was the 381 hp in my ‘10 Tundra, so a difference of 271 hp on paper. In reality the Ciera wasn’t making anywhere near claimed power by the time I started driving it, so the difference is probably closer to 300 hp.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 14:49 |
|
190 HP (1995 Nissan Maxima) vs. 271 HP (2010 Accord Coupe V6) = 81 HP difference.
I did not have a shitcan as a first car, and I haven’t personally owned any “real” sports cars, so my gap is pretty small. My current GTI is rated at 210, but really makes more like 250 from the factory, and mine is tuned for something more like 280 or 290 (at the crank, not WHP).
![]() 01/10/2017 at 15:10 |
|
220hp Difference.
Max: 340hp - Dodge Magnum R/T
Min: 120hp - Chevy S10 2.2L
Unless you count the car my parents owned for my brother and I to learn on. Then it’s 250hp difference, with a minimum of 89hp*.
*There’s no way that 4cyl Mustang still had all of those 89 hp when I was driving it.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 15:27 |
|
‘98 accord-114 hp on a good day, I figure it’s making like 95 on an average day. Mercedes S600-factory stated 493 hp, but apparently it pushing closer to 540 at the crank. On paper that’s a 379 hp difference but in actuality it’s closer to 440 hp.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 15:28 |
|
Try a Benz V12 lol. Ridiculous torque.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 15:37 |
|
38hp. 140hp Ranger and Integra and 102hp in my old EG Civic. Do I win a key chain for owning the most consistent power outputs?
![]() 01/10/2017 at 16:01 |
|
Ha ha, we are all winners here.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 16:42 |
|
Got you beat (barely), with the “same” car separated by almost 40 years. My 76 Mustang II matched your 92hp, while my 14 Roush Mustang has 575hp.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 17:15 |
|
Hmmm. I like this
GTO: 385 @ wheels so about 450hp @ crank
AH Sprite MKIV 1275: 65hp @ crank
Difference: 450-65= 385...
or my wheel hp on the GTO.... HA HA that is funny
![]() 01/10/2017 at 17:16 |
|
Or secondly my Boss
1965 GTO: 785 crank hp
1962 Lemans/Tempest: 120 crank hp
difference 665 hp
![]() 01/10/2017 at 18:18 |
|
2007 Mazdaspeed 3 263hp - 1995 Miata 128hp = 135hp
![]() 01/10/2017 at 20:21 |
|
Oh shit. I forgot about my race car. Previous low: 190 hp. New low: 105 hp. High is still 300.
![]() 01/10/2017 at 22:10 |
|
289 HP.
Back in ‘04-’05 I owned both my most powerful and weakest vehicles with the biggest power spread at the same time.
I had a ‘98 Trans Am WS6 that, with just a catback and lid+filter, dyno’d 335 RWHP, so figuring a 15% driveline loss was producing about 385 HP.
My daily driver at the time was a little ‘90 Isuzu P’up that, at least when new, was rated at 96 HP at the crank. It wasn’t fast or quick, but with the 5-speed manual it was a joy to drive, handy, efficient (I’d sometimes see 28 mpg with mostly city driving), and was basically indestructible. I loved that truck and miss it dearly.